Ramalinga Reddy Clarifies Policy on Advertisements on BMTC and KSRTC Buses

The Bengaluru Live January 26, 2026 8:58 PM 2 minutes read

📘 Read this story in Kannada

Bengaluru South District (Ramanagara): Amid growing public criticism and online backlash over the display of private advertisements (Gutkha) on BMTC and KSRTC buses, Karnataka Transport Minister Ramalinga Reddy has defended the policy, stating that such advertisements generate significant revenue for public transport corporations.

Responding to media queries, the minister said advertisements on BMTC buses alone generate nearly ₹60 crore annually, which plays a crucial role in sustaining the transport system. He added that similar revenue streams also support KSRTC units operating in regions such as Kalyana Karnataka and North Karnataka.

“If there is public objection to specific products like gutka, then the focus should be on banning such products nationwide,” Ramalinga Reddy said. “Protesting against stickers on buses will not solve the issue. If gutka is banned across the country, we have no objection.”

Amid growing public criticism and online backlash over the display of private advertisements (Gutkha) on BMTC and KSRTC buses, Karnataka Transport Minister Ramalinga Reddy has defended the policy, stating that such advertisements generate significant revenue for public transport corporations.

Addressing concerns over excessive branding, the minister clarified that advertisements are permitted only on BMTC buses and not on KSRTC buses, and even then, a strict cap of 40% coverage has been imposed.

“I have already issued clear instructions and orders. Advertisements must not exceed 40% of the bus exterior. Full-body wrapping of buses will not be allowed going forward,” he said.

The minister’s remarks come amid renewed criticism on social media, with several users alleging that private advertisements were being reintroduced extensively on BMTC buses ahead of upcoming years. Ramalinga Reddy reiterated that the policy is revenue-driven but regulated, and assured that violations of the prescribed limits would not be permitted.

The issue continues to trigger debate between commuters, activists, and policymakers over the balance between public aesthetics, health concerns, and financial sustainability of public transport services.