NEW DELHI: The Parliament passed the Waqf Amendment Bill 2025 in the early hours of Friday after a marathon and heated debate. Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar said, “Ayes 128 and Noes 95, Absent zero. The Bill is passed.”
The Mussalman Wakf (Repeal) Bill, 2024′ has also been passed in the Parliament. The House sat beyond midnight to pass the legislation. Union Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju accused the opposition parties of trying to mislead people on the Waqf Amendment Bill and said it will benefit crores of people from the Muslim community.
Replying to the over 12-hour-long debate on the bill in Rajya Sabha, Rijiju said several suggestions made by the Joint Parliamentary Committee had been incorporated in the revised bill. “When the Waqf Amendment Bill was first drafted and the bill that we are passing now, there are a lot of changes. The bill would have been completely different if we had not accepted anyone’s suggestions,” he said.
ऐतिहासिक क्षण
लोकसभा के बाद Rajya Sabha में भी वक़्फ़ संशोधन बिल पास
पक्ष -128 वोट, विपक्ष-95 वोट
मोदी है तो मुमकिन है
समस्त देशवासियों को बधाई व शुभकामनाएँ,
अभिनंदन, पीएम @narendramodi, गृहमंत्री @AmitShah, केंद्रीय अल्पसंख्यक मंत्री @KirenRijiju.#WaqfAmendmentBill pic.twitter.com/yvcTlg3Aot— Rajesh Bhatia (@rajeshbhatiabjp) April 4, 2025
He said the BJP-led government was not scaring anyone and accused the opposition parties of trying to create a scare among members of the minority community. “You are trying to create a scare and trying to take (them) away from the mainstream. Do not mislead in the future..it (the bill) will benefit crores of Muslims,” he said.
Rijiju said once a property is declared a Waqf property, its status cannot be changed and this has to be done by following the due process.
Lok Sabha, which took up discussion on the Waqf (Amendment Bill) on Wednesday, passed it past midnight after a marathon debate. Rijiju said there is no interference in the Waqf property by the government.
#WATCH | Delhi: In the Rajya Sabha, Union Minister Kiren Rijiju says, “The Waqf Board is a statutory body and why should only Muslims be included in the statutory body? If there is a dispute between Hindus and Muslims, how will that dispute be resolved?… There can be disputes… pic.twitter.com/6xqQDl3yhD
— ANI (@ANI) April 3, 2025
“The Waqf Board is a statutory body and why should only Muslims be included in the statutory body? If there is a dispute between Hindus and Muslims, how will that dispute be resolved?… There can be disputes with non-Muslims in the Waqf Board as well…The statutory body should be secular and people of all religions should be represented,” he said.
He also said no non-Islamic member will get a place in the Waqf Board’s work related to religious donations. Rijiju, who moved the bill for passing in Rajya Sabha earlier, said the government had strengthened mechanisms under the bill, including tribunals.
“We have included the Right to Appeal in this bill. If you don’t get your right in the Tribunal, then you can file a petition in court under this Right to Appeal,” he said. Rijiju said that the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, will be renamed as the UMEED (Unified Waqf Management Empowerment Efficiency and Development) Bill.
Rijiju also accused the Congress-led UPA government of denotifying 123 prime properties on the eve of Lok Sabha polls in 2014 due to “vote bank politics”. “Just before implementation of model code of conduct ahead of 2014 general elections, on March 5, 2014, UPA govt denotified 123 prime properties and handed them over to Delhi Waqf Board. These properties were of the Housing and Urban Affairs ministry,” he said.
“If you look at it, then the case was going on since 1970, and it is pending since then, you must have heard of the CGO complex, I can give the list later, they handed over prime properties,” he added.
The government introduced the revised bill after incorporating the recommendations of the Joint Parliamentary Committee, which examined the legislation introduced in August last year. The bill seeks to amend the Act of 1995 and improve the administration and management of waqf properties in India.
The Bill aims to overcome the shortcomings of the previous act and enhance the efficiency of Waqf boards, improving the registration process and increasing the role of technology in managing waqf records. Parties of the INDIA bloc have strongly opposed the bill.
The marathon debate in Rajya Sabha saw several clashes between opposition members and treasury benches. After Congress member Syed Naseer Hussain’s remarks slamming the government over the bill, BJP member Radha Mohan Das Agrawal targeted him alleging that when he was elected to Rajya Sabha “Pakistan Zindabad” slogans were raised allegedly by his supporters in Karnataka.
Opposition members later objected to Agrawal’s remarks and said defamatory allegations had been levelled against the member without any advance notice as per rules.
Home Minister Amit Shah said that no allegations had been levelled against the Congress member. He said the BJP member only said that “Pakistan Zindabad” slogans were raised. “These were raised by someone else. Naseer Hussain has to explain why they were raised,” Amit Shah said.
Naseer Hussain said no one in the gathering had heard such slogans that only one journalist had reported about it and he had asked the state government to conduct a probe to ascertain truth and punish the guilty.
There was a din briefly when Sudhanshu Trivedi was speaking on the bill. The BJP member said that the Muslim community, which was earlier identified with talented, creative people from the Bollywood, was now sought to be identified by people who faced cases for breaching the law. He took some names.
With some members of opposition raising strong objections, Amit Shah said the BJP member had not made remarks about the Muslim community as such but taken names of some people facing cases who were associated with the INDIA alliance.
Amit Shah also took potshots at Congress member Digvijaya Singh, who made brief comments amid the din. “Inko mera hauha hai, sirf main dikhta hun…”, Amit Shah said.
Amit Shah also countered Digvijaya Singh over remarks that he was Gujarat’s Home Minister during riots in the state in 2002. “I was not Home Minister…I became Home Minister after 18 months,” Amit Shah said.
Opposition members demanded that some remarks of Sudhanshu Trivedi should be expunged. Several members including Leader of House JP Nadda and Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge took part in the debate. (ANI)
About the Author
