DRDO: No collateral damage reported after Tapas drone crash in Chitradurga

Date:

NEW DELHI:

There was no collateral damage from the Tapas unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) which crashed in Karnataka on Sunday morning, DRDO said.

“TAPAS UAV was undergoing an experimental flight trial today morning from ATR Challakere, Karnataka. During the flight, a technical snag was encountered and the UAV crashed in a nearby farmland. The technical reason is being investigated and there is no collateral damage,” DRDO posted on X, formerly Twitter.

A Tapas unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) crashed in agriculture fields near a village in Karnataka’s Chitradurga on Sunday morning, officials had said.

Visuals from the site showed that the damaged UAV and its equipment inside lay scattered on the field.

Tactical Airborne Platform for Aerial Surveillance-Beyond Horizon-201 or Tapas BH-201 is a long-endurance unmanned aerial vehicle that used to be previously referred to as Rustom-II. PTI

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

BBMP Executive Engineer Yerappa Reddy Caught Red-Handed Taking ₹10 Lakh Bribe in Lokayukta Trap Operation

The accused, H.V. Yerappa Reddy, serving as the Executive Engineer of C.V. Raman Nagar Division, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP), was caught red-handed during a trap laid by the Lokayukta police based on a complaint filed by Hemant G.M., a contractor.

Karnataka Minister Warns NEET Aspirants Against Fraudsters, Vows Strict Action

KEA to Handle All Medical Seat Allotments Through Transparent...

Karnataka CM Assures Safe Return of Kannadigas from War-Hit Regions

Bengaluru: Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Tuesday assured that...

Bengaluru Stampede: Karnataka HC Questions Sealed Cover Status Report, Calls for Transparency

A bench of Acting Chief Justice V Kameswar Rao and Justice CM Joshi, hearing a suo motu PIL, was told by Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty that the government was not avoiding disclosure but wanted to prevent sensationalism of preliminary findings. The court, however, appeared unconvinced, noting that it would appoint an amicus curiae to assess the appropriateness of sealed submissions.
bengaluru {"prefetch":[{"source":"document","where":{"and":[{"href_matches":"\/*"},{"not":{"href_matches":["\/wp-*.php","\/wp-admin\/*","\/wp-content\/uploads\/*","\/wp-content\/*","\/wp-content\/plugins\/*","\/wp-content\/themes\/thebengalurulive\/*","\/*\\?(.+)"]}},{"not":{"selector_matches":"a[rel~=\"nofollow\"]"}},{"not":{"selector_matches":".no-prefetch, .no-prefetch a"}}]},"eagerness":"conservative"}]}