Karnataka High Court adjourns BBMP reservation hearing to Sep 27

Date:

BENGALURU:

The Karnataka High Court on Wednesday adjourned the hearing of petitions challenging the reservation list announced for the 243 wards of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) to September 27.

The State Election Commission was earlier expected to announce the related final voters list on September 22. But the court was informed that it would now be announced on September 29.

Justice Hemanth Chandanagoudar had earlier dismissed a batch of petitions challenging the delimitation of wards.

On Wednesday, he asked the Election Commission’s advocate about the rationale behind reserving all wards in an Assembly constituency limit for women. The EC was asked to present its arguments in the next date of hearing.

Out of the 243 wards, 126 are reserved for women. Out of the total, 81 seats are reserved for backward classes, 28 for SCs and four for STs.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

BBMP Executive Engineer Yerappa Reddy Caught Red-Handed Taking ₹10 Lakh Bribe in Lokayukta Trap Operation

The accused, H.V. Yerappa Reddy, serving as the Executive Engineer of C.V. Raman Nagar Division, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP), was caught red-handed during a trap laid by the Lokayukta police based on a complaint filed by Hemant G.M., a contractor.

Karnataka Minister Warns NEET Aspirants Against Fraudsters, Vows Strict Action

KEA to Handle All Medical Seat Allotments Through Transparent...

Karnataka CM Assures Safe Return of Kannadigas from War-Hit Regions

Bengaluru: Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Tuesday assured that...

Bengaluru Stampede: Karnataka HC Questions Sealed Cover Status Report, Calls for Transparency

A bench of Acting Chief Justice V Kameswar Rao and Justice CM Joshi, hearing a suo motu PIL, was told by Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty that the government was not avoiding disclosure but wanted to prevent sensationalism of preliminary findings. The court, however, appeared unconvinced, noting that it would appoint an amicus curiae to assess the appropriateness of sealed submissions.
bengaluru {"prefetch":[{"source":"document","where":{"and":[{"href_matches":"\/*"},{"not":{"href_matches":["\/wp-*.php","\/wp-admin\/*","\/wp-content\/uploads\/*","\/wp-content\/*","\/wp-content\/plugins\/*","\/wp-content\/themes\/thebengalurulive\/*","\/*\\?(.+)"]}},{"not":{"selector_matches":"a[rel~=\"nofollow\"]"}},{"not":{"selector_matches":".no-prefetch, .no-prefetch a"}}]},"eagerness":"conservative"}]}