Karnataka HC dismisses Twitter petition challenging Centre’s blocking orders; imposes Rs 50 lakh cost

Date:

BENGALURU:

The High Court of Karnataka on Friday dismissed a petition filed by Twitter Inc., challenging several blocking and take-down orders issued by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, saying the company’s plea was devoid of merits. The single-judge bench of Justice Krishna S Dixit which dictated the operative portion of the judgement also imposed a cost of Rs 50 lakh on Twitter and ordered it to be paid to the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority within 45 days.

Reading the operative portion, the HC said, ”In the above circumstances this petition being devoid of merits is liable to be dismissed with exemplary costs and accordingly it is. Petitioner is levied with an exemplary cost of Rs 50 lakh payable to the Karnataka State Legal Service Authority, Bengaluru, within 45 days. If delay is brooked, it attracts an additional levy of Rs 5,000 per day.” ”I am convinced with contention of the Centre that they have powers to block tweets and block accounts,” the judge said while dismissing Twitter’s petition.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

BBMP Executive Engineer Yerappa Reddy Caught Red-Handed Taking ₹10 Lakh Bribe in Lokayukta Trap Operation

The accused, H.V. Yerappa Reddy, serving as the Executive Engineer of C.V. Raman Nagar Division, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP), was caught red-handed during a trap laid by the Lokayukta police based on a complaint filed by Hemant G.M., a contractor.

Karnataka Minister Warns NEET Aspirants Against Fraudsters, Vows Strict Action

KEA to Handle All Medical Seat Allotments Through Transparent...

Karnataka CM Assures Safe Return of Kannadigas from War-Hit Regions

Bengaluru: Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Tuesday assured that...

Bengaluru Stampede: Karnataka HC Questions Sealed Cover Status Report, Calls for Transparency

A bench of Acting Chief Justice V Kameswar Rao and Justice CM Joshi, hearing a suo motu PIL, was told by Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty that the government was not avoiding disclosure but wanted to prevent sensationalism of preliminary findings. The court, however, appeared unconvinced, noting that it would appoint an amicus curiae to assess the appropriateness of sealed submissions.
bengaluru {"prefetch":[{"source":"document","where":{"and":[{"href_matches":"\/*"},{"not":{"href_matches":["\/wp-*.php","\/wp-admin\/*","\/wp-content\/uploads\/*","\/wp-content\/*","\/wp-content\/plugins\/*","\/wp-content\/themes\/thebengalurulive\/*","\/*\\?(.+)"]}},{"not":{"selector_matches":"a[rel~=\"nofollow\"]"}},{"not":{"selector_matches":".no-prefetch, .no-prefetch a"}}]},"eagerness":"conservative"}]}